Tecnología Fluídica Activa™
Sensor de presión
Pieza de mano
Tecnología fluídica activaTM
Tecnología quick valveTM
La tecnología fluídica activaTM
Utiliza una placa de compresión para ajustar la presión de la bolsa que contiene la solución de irrigación BSS®, compensando los cambios en el ojo1,4-5
![](https://alconrevolucionalafaco.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/tecnologia-active-fluidics.png)
Active Sentry® Experience
BENEFICIOS Active Sentry®
Simposios y eventos
-
SECOIR 2021
¿Quién dijo límites?
Simposio virtual de Alcon en el congreso de la
Sociedad Española de Cirugía Ocular Implanto-Refractiva
CONTACTO
Contacta con tu representante Alcon para más información
1. Centurion® Vision System Operator’s Manual.
2. Active Sentry® pressure sensing handpiece Directions for use.
3. Sharif-Kashani P. et al; Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:96.
4. Nicoli CM. et al. Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):157-162.
5. Boukhny M. et al. A novel phacoemulsification system utilizing feedback based IOP target control. ASCRS-ASOA Symposium and Congress; April 25-29, 2014; Boston, MA.
6. Shumway C. Utility of a novel hybrid phacoemulsification tip to prevent posterior capsule rupture. Presentation at ASCRS 2019, 3-7 May, San Diego.
7. Centurion® FMS pack directions for use.
8. Alcon Data on File. Final engineering study report – Alcon phacoemulsification systems occlusion break surge performance in support of comparison. Ref. 02559, 03.05.2017.
9. Thorne A. et al. Phacoemulsifier occlusion break surge volume reduction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44:1491–1496
10. Khokhar S. et al. Effect of balanced phacoemulsification tip on the outcomes of torsional phacoemulsification using an active-fluidics system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(1):22-28.
11. Solomon et al. Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42:542–549.
12. Aravena et al. Aqueous volume loss associated with occlusion break surge in phacoemulsifiers from 4 different manufacturers. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44:884–888.
13. Zacharías J. Comparative motion profile characterization of the mini flared and balanced phacoemulsification tips. ESCRS; 5-9 de septiembre de 2015; Barcelona, España. 8. Datos de Alcon en el archivo. 2017
14. Vasavada AR. et al. Comparison of torsional and microburst longitudinal phacoemulsification: a prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(1):109-114.
2. Active Sentry® pressure sensing handpiece Directions for use.
3. Sharif-Kashani P. et al; Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:96.
4. Nicoli CM. et al. Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):157-162.
5. Boukhny M. et al. A novel phacoemulsification system utilizing feedback based IOP target control. ASCRS-ASOA Symposium and Congress; April 25-29, 2014; Boston, MA.
6. Shumway C. Utility of a novel hybrid phacoemulsification tip to prevent posterior capsule rupture. Presentation at ASCRS 2019, 3-7 May, San Diego.
7. Centurion® FMS pack directions for use.
8. Alcon Data on File. Final engineering study report – Alcon phacoemulsification systems occlusion break surge performance in support of comparison. Ref. 02559, 03.05.2017.
9. Thorne A. et al. Phacoemulsifier occlusion break surge volume reduction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44:1491–1496
10. Khokhar S. et al. Effect of balanced phacoemulsification tip on the outcomes of torsional phacoemulsification using an active-fluidics system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(1):22-28.
11. Solomon et al. Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42:542–549.
12. Aravena et al. Aqueous volume loss associated with occlusion break surge in phacoemulsifiers from 4 different manufacturers. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44:884–888.
13. Zacharías J. Comparative motion profile characterization of the mini flared and balanced phacoemulsification tips. ESCRS; 5-9 de septiembre de 2015; Barcelona, España. 8. Datos de Alcon en el archivo. 2017
14. Vasavada AR. et al. Comparison of torsional and microburst longitudinal phacoemulsification: a prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(1):109-114.